Advise-in Blog

Most Recent Posts

New ABA Accreditation Standard:  Is Bar Passage Rate Change Enough?

The American Bar Association recently passed a new standard for accreditation for law schools, mandating that to maintain accreditation, at least 75% of graduates of a law school must pass the bar within two years. If they don’t, it doesn’t mean immediate loss of accreditation but the ABA will presumably monitor steps law schools take to fix the problem.

There is an excellent analysis of the ABA standard by Steven Chung in Above the Law. I won’t repeat his analysis, with which I mostly agree. It is well worth reading. I am, however, less inclined to give credit to the critics of the ABA’s action.

I start from a fundamental premise. Law students are paying a ton, both in money and time, for a career. I understand that some people just want a kind of cool education, but the vast bulk of law school students want—and need—a decent job after graduation.

As a law school, if you can’t get 75% of your students in a position to meet one of the necessary requirements of getting a legal job, you’re either a pretty poor law school or you’re admitting people you know aren’t likely to pass the bar, or both. Either way, it’s hard to see why you should stay in business. Those who can and do pass the bar from those schools can find other schools; it’s not like the USA is short of law schools.

I even wonder—as I frequently wonder about ABA monitoring—whether the standard is high enough. Chung points out that very few law schools are likely going to be affected even by this standard. But why not an additional standard—one that sets a requirement that within 3 years, a certain percentage of graduates must have a job that requires a legal education?

Certainly, a small fraction of law school students don’t want a job as a lawyer, and are going into policy or investment banking or some other field, but believe that a J.D. will be useful for those careers as well. That is, however, a small fraction (like those who just want a legal education); most of the poor employment numbers at most law schools are because people want but can’t find a legal job. Most people are going to law school so they can be lawyers, it’s as simple as that.

There has to be some reasonable linkage between the cost of law school and the career opportunities it provides. The majority of law schools meet that standard but some do not. Maybe it’s time to cull those schools more firmly, so that law students as a group can get a better return on their investment.


by Kyle Pasewark at Advise-in Solutions on June 17, 2019.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Tag List

university of iowa law school, university of arizona law school, top lsat percentile, ryan calo, perfect lsat score, lsat techniques, lsat study techniques, lsat study guides, lsat repeater data, lsat primer, lsat preparation, lsat prep, lsat logic games, lsat dates, lsat, legal services demand, legal job market, legal hiring, legal employment, legal education, legal careers, lawyer satisfaction, lawyer happiness, law schools, law school tuition cuts, law school rankings, law school financial aid, law school employment statistics, law school education, law school debt, law school costs, law school applications, law school application data, law school application advice, law school admissions data, law school admissions council, law school admissions, law school, law firms, kyle pasewark, highest-ranked law school, highest lsat score, harvard law school, gre, best lsat score, best lsat preparation courses, best lsat preparation, best lsat prep courses, best lsat prep, best law school admissions consultant, attorney jobs, analytical reasoning, american bar association, advise-in solutions, aba law school employment data, aba, 2014 law school application,